Go to the homepage for the Sylva Herald and Ruralite

Letters to the editor: 07/10/03

Jesus Video Project wastes donations

To the Editor:

I just read about the Jackson County Jesus Video Project plan to put a Jesus video in every home in Jackson County by spring 2004. So far they have raised more than $30,000 to do this and hope to raise over $50,000 for this project.

I have never heard of anything as ridiculous as this. What an outrageous waste of precious donations!

Having been raised a Christian, I am very sure that Jesus would much rather we donate money to worthy causes to help the less fortunate in our community, such as Manna Food Bank, REACH of Jackson or Macon counties, SAFE of Bryson City or United Christian Ministry.

Maybe putting a few of these videos in the library would make much more sense.  For me, I don't even own a VCR, so any video sent to me will go in the trash, as probably many others will around the county.

Janet Dickinson
Sylva


Get involved; Stop the bypass

To the Editor:

Now we all know the possible routes for the proposed Sylva Bypass. We can study the map and try to decide if we are in the bulldozer's path or are spared. Either way the road is going to affect us all in a big way. I'm right at the center of the southern corridor on Locust Creek, so I'm scared and angry.

I love Locust Creek, one of the smaller coves in the center of our county, about half way between Sylva and Cullowhee. It's a beautiful valley and if you haven't driven down it, you should. The road winds slowly upward past cow pastures, old mountain cabins, an attractive trailer park, double-wide trailers, new homes and old.

When I walk my dog down the road after work, winter and summer, sunshine and rain, people slow down and wave. I have watched frisky new calves growing fat and slow over a season and once saw four baby raccoons at night (eight eyes reflecting my headlights). The vegetation goes from dogwood to honeysuckle to daylilies to black-eyed Susans to the reds and yellows of fall.

You can hear the creek bubbling and the flute-like songs of wood thrush. Bluebirds love the open fields, and I once saw a flock of more than 100 robins, gobbling insects and worms, on their way north in spring.

All this will be destroyed by an enormous highway - the beauty, quiet, serenity, peace and sense of being in a valley community. So I'm going to get involved and see what I can do to help stop the Sylva Bypass.

It seems to me we should first try and find ways to make the roads we have work better before we go about tearing up our mountains and destroying people's homes. Despite all that we've been told, the bypass won't make traffic move better on N.C. 107.

If you love Jackson County, get involved before this superhighway destroys some of the most beautiful areas of our county: River Road, Webster, Cane Creek and Locust Creek.

Suzanne Fuller
Sylva


Officials missed at field day event

To the Editor:

Amateur Radio Emergency Services of Jackson County, an affiliate of the Amateur Radio Relay League, would especially like to thank the Sylva Herald and WRGC Radio for running our public service announcements. Also, the Jackson County Recreation Department for providing us the use of one of their facilities to erect our communication station the weekend of June 28 and 29. The event was a huge success with contacts made all over the United States and Canada.

Amateur radio may be considered by some as just a hobby, but licensed operators consider emergency communications in a disaster an obligation, according to the Federal Communication Commission rules and regulations. These folks volunteer their time and equipment to their county at no cost for their services.

It was especially sad for me to listen to the reports given on the national traffic system for this event, to note that Jackson County was the only county across North Carolina that did not have an elected official or a representative from any of the served agencies take five or 10 minutes to drop by the event and find out what ARES and amateur radio is all about. Each and every one of these people had prior notification and some even personal invitations.

If called upon in an emergency to set up communications, amateur radio operators of Jackson county would never say "We don't have time." It is our obligation to serve our county when needed.

We sincerely hope that next year some of these people will attend our field day event and learn what amateur radio can do in an emergency. Thanks so much to the operators who attended and to all who supported this event this event.

Ron Rearick
Whittier


County did not clearly think through recycling changes

To the Editor:

My name is Bobby Gunter. My wife, Sandy, and I own and operate Gunter Enterprises, along with our three children, Brittany, Coy and Holly. Our family handles trash and recycling from all over Jackson County. I have been in the waste removal business for over five years now. I have learned the importance of recycling over this time.

There is not a fortune to be made in recycling. Sometimes you are lucky to break even. That is why you must look at the real reasons to recycle. Recycling will, over the long haul, make life better for everyone. It will help the survival of our planet.

This is why it bothers me when local governments cut out recycling or cause the recycling process to become more difficult. They always say the same thing, "We need to save money." There are plenty of things that could be cut other than something this important to our future.

Jackson County's manager, solid waste technician and the county commissioners, trying to save the county money, have jumped into a deal with a company to handle recycling that I feel will cost us more in the long run in not only money, but in loss of people trying to recycle.

At first glance this new system looks good, unless you have handled the amount of recycling our county produces. I have. This plan will not save money over time. The county will receive $15 per ton for cardboard and mixed paper. The county will pay $12.50 per ton to get rid of glass, metal cans, aluminum cans and plastic.
In the county's theory we will either come out ahead or break even. With the amount of glass alone I don't think this will happen. This county goes through a great deal of glass. We are also paying to get rid of the one recycling item that makes money without a lot of work, aluminum.

Another expense that isn't talked about too much is the freight on the loads of recycling leaving our county. Until other counties join this program, we will be charged freight. This almost guarantees the county will be going in the hole on expense.

I would also like to visit this recycling facility, wherever it is or will be located. I have read about this type of place and would very much like to see how it works. The reason I want to see it is, according to who you ask at the county, the recycling is going to a different place. I have been told it was going to Asheville, Charlotte, South Carolina and even Georgia.

Here are some of the problems with haulers or anyone with large amounts of recycling. First, we have always had a place to take bulk recycling and been able to unload it quickly and easily. With the new plan the county wants us to either put truckloads of cardboard through the little slots at the SRCs or take it to the transfer station site and carry it by hand up some steps and into a 50-foot closed top trailer and stack it neatly.

This way the county can sell it to Asheville Waste Paper for $15 per ton. Either of these will cause price increases due to time spent for residential and commercial customers. This could be avoided by giving us a place to dump it. Up until today (Monday) we could still dump cardboard at the Webster Enterprise site. The haulers and people with a lot of cardboard were giving it to Webster, which was in turn bailing it and selling it to Jackson Paper for much more than $15 per ton.

Everyone was happy until today. I had a meeting with (county manager Ken) Westmoreland to talk about some of these problems. I was told he would look into things and to be patient. After this meeting I had mixed feelings. He did take the time to hear my problems and thoughts on this matter, but there was no true feeling that anything would be done.

I was wrong about this, because in the time it took me to load my truck with cardboard and drive to Dillsboro, phones rang at Webster Enterprises, and then at the Dillsboro facility, and we were no longer allowed to dump cardboard. While it is true that Webster Enterprises wants out of the recycling business, they have to stay open so that the county has a place to put white goods for at least 30 days. We were just helping make it worth their time and effort to be there.

I was also told that the person who is now handling the white goods would be taking care of the freon removal as well. I have been there while the new guy was loading his truck, the freon is removed when the pipes are broken while it is loaded into the truck. This is not the proper way to do so, there is a machine that is used to safely do this. But remember the county will get a percentage of whatever he makes hauling the white goods so I guess that makes it OK.

Placing large amounts of all other recyclable materials into the containers will also take lots of time, so please remember folks that when a hauler is in the way at a SRC doing their recycling, it is not our choice to do it this way.

Then when these containers are full they will be hauled to the transfer station and unloaded onto concrete pads and left until there are enough of them to fill an 18-wheeler. I have been told that there would need to be anywhere from three to 10 containers to fill the 18-wheeler.

Then I asked our solid waste technician what would happen at the SRCs while these boxes were gone? Her reply was, "We have not figured that out yet." I then asked should this not have been figured out before this was started? She said, "Yes."

Now don't blame GDS or the site attendants for the problems that have already and will arise from this. Call your commissioners. Let them know what you think. GDS personnel are only doing their job.

Also I found out today what happens when there are no boxes at the SRC to put your recycling in. Another recycler called me and told me that the attendant at the Dillsboro SRC was told that while the boxes were gone, to put recycling in the trash compactor. Now that is just the greatest idea yet. NOT!! Let's not figure out how to keep the recycling going; let's dispose of it. NOT!! That is our tax dollars at work.

The new trash alternative to use Macon County seemed to me a great savings for our county. It is for the government part. Anyone from a resident to a hauler will be paying $45 per ton to use the dump site. The county will then only pay $21.95 per ton to dispose of it. This rate is not much of a savings to anyone.

I hope our landfill tax will drop greatly since the county is charging double what it costs to get rid of the trash. If it doesn't save the common man money, why did we even do it? Mark my words: All these quiet and quick changes our county government has done will cost us a lot more in the years to come.

All private haulers bought permits to dispose of residential trash and limited commercial trash and all recyclables at the SRCs. Limited commercial is two 33-gallon trash bags per business per week. That is fair. There are three or four residential haulers around the Sylva area and about the same up towards Cashiers.

But some 100 permits were sold the first year and again now in the second year of the ordinance. The reason is that some commercial businesses have been sold the same permit I have. If one of these businesses hired me, I could only take two bags per week into the SRCs. But since they have a permit, they can haul as much of their own commercial trash as they want to into the SRCs. Now does that make sense?

When you figure at $150 for each permit the county has made over $15,000 per year by doing this. These people don't haul from residential homes, they haul their business trash. What does the money from these permits go towards to help with the county budget?

My final comments about money being spent by our county have nothing to do with the solid waste area. I read an article recently where REACH asked the county for $50,000 to help fund their services for our community. The county commissioners turned them down. They said it wasn't in the budget. I can understand that. Money runs out, you can't help everyone.

Then I read that the commissioners will spend $50,000 for a feasibility study on putting our library near Southwestern Community College. Now this makes no sense to me at all. Don't give the money to REACH, which provide a much-needed service. Give it to someone to do a study that is unnecessary. There is all of this controversy about moving the library. Just let the voters decide if they want it in Sylva city limits or in Webster. With a vote no one can complain. The people would have spoken and the commissioners could say that they done exactly what the people asked them to do.

Bobby Gunter
Cullowhee

Back to Archive: 07/10/03.


Go to the Homepage Contact Subscribe Advertising Classifieds Archives Obituaries Submissions Deadlines About The Sylva Herald